Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Fracture characterization of novel bioceramic microbeads filled polymer composite

  • Composites & nanocomposites
  • Published:
Journal of Materials Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The biomaterial poly(l-lactic acid) (PLLA) is commonly used for bone fixation devices and dental surgeries; however its natural osseointegrating ability is generally poor, which can lead to dislocation and partial fractures. Recently, calcium phosphate bioceramics have been incorporated into PLLA in order to redress this issue and improve the osseointegrating ability of the material. This study incorporated calcium phosphate microbeads in PLLA at various concentrations and measured their effect on the critical stress intensity factor, KIC and critical energy release rate at crack initiation, Gin, as well as the unusual fracture mechanic they induced. The inclusion of microbeads into the polymer matrix reduced the materials’ fracture toughness, from a KIC of 34 ± 7 Pa m−1/2 for blank PLLA, to 18 ± 1 Pa m−1/2 for the strongest bead containing group; and from a Gin of 1030 ± 150 J m−2 for blank PLLA to 200 ± 18 J m−2 for the same microbead containing group. Importantly however, the microbead containing groups fractured by a different mechanism, which was identified by observing fracture surface morphologies, electron probe microanalysis and finite element analysis. It was seen that polymer intruded into the porous microbeads, and resulted in regions of increased stiffness in the polymer matrix around each bead. This prevented void formation at the polymer/microbead interface, but it allowed the strain energy density to increase rapidly under load in microbead containing groups. This energy concentration in turn caused fractures to occur sooner, and resulted in the brittle fracture surfaces seen around microbeads. The identification of this fracture mechanism is important to understand, as it suggests a way to greatly improve the fracture toughness of the material, reducing the difference in stiffness of the two components. This fracture mechanism may also be useful in explaining other observed fracture events containing two materials of greatly varying stiffness.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5
Figure 6
Figure 7
Figure 8
Figure 9
Figure 10
Figure 11
Figure 12
Figure 13
Figure 14
Figure 15
Figure 16
Figure 17

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Majola A, Vainionpaa S, Rokkanen P, Mikkola HM, Tormala P (1992) Absorbable self-reinforced polylactide (SR-PLA) composite rods for fracture fixation—strength and strength retention in the bone and subcutaneous tissue of rabbits. J Mater Sci Mater Med 3:43–47

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Middleton JC, Tipton AJ (2000) Synthetic biodegradable polymers as orthopedic devices. Biomaterials 21:2335–2346

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Simion M, Misitiano U, Gionso L, Salvato A (1997) Treatment of dehiscences and fenestrations around dental implants using resorbable and nonresorbable membranes associated with bone autografts: a comparative clinical study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 12:159–167

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Shafer BL, Simonian PT (2002) Broken poly-l-lactic acid interface screw after ligament reconstruction. J Arthrosc Relat Surg 18:1–4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Kosaka M, Uemura F, Tomemori S, Kamiishi H (2003) Scanning electron microscope observations of ‘fractured’ biodegradable plates and screws. J Cranio-Maxillofac Surg 31:10–14

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Wang ZL, Wang Y, Ito Y, Zhang PB, Chen XS (2016) A comparative study on the in vivo degradation of poly(l-lactide) based composite implants for bone fracture fixation. Sci Rep 6:20770. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep20770

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Adell R, Lekholm U, Rockler B, Branemark PI (1981) A 15-year study of osseointegrated implants in the treatment of the edentulous jaw. Int J Oral Surg 10:387–416

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Rothman RH, Cohn JC (1990) Cemented versus cementless total hip-arthroplasty—a critical review. Clin Orthop Relat Res 254:153–169

    Google Scholar 

  9. Lin PL, Fang HW, Tseng T, Lee WH (2007) Effects of hydroxyapatite on mechanical and biological behaviour of polylactic acid composite materials. Mater Lett 61:3009–3013

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Mondal S, Nguyen TP, Pham V, Hoang G, Manivasagan P, Kim MH, Nam SY, Oh J (2020) Hydroxyapatite nano bioceramics optimized 3D printed poly lactic acid scaffold for bone tissue engineering application. Ceram Int 46:3443–3455

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Ranjan N, Singh R, Ahuja IPS (2020) Development of PLA-HAp-CS-based biocompatible functional prototype: a case study. J Thermoplast Compos 33:305–323

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Backes EH, Pires LD, Beatrice CAG, Costa LC, Passador FR, Pessan LA (2020) Fabrication of biocompatible composites of poly(lactic acid)/hydroxyapatite envisioning medical applications. Polym Eng Sci 60:636–644

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Cardenas-Trivino G, Carrasco-Garcia G (2019) Chitosan composites prepared with hydroxyapatite and lactic acid as bone substitute. J Chil Chem Soc 64:4613–4618

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Alksne M, Kalvaityte M, Simoliunas E, Rinkunaite I, Gendviliene I, Locs J, Rutkunas V, Bukelskiene V (2020) In vitro comparison of 3D printed polylactic acid/hydroxyapatite and polylactic acid/bioglass composite scaffolds: insights into materials for bone regeneration. J Mech Behav Biomed 104:103641. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmbbm.2020.103641

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Kane JK, Weiss-Bilka HE, Meagher MJ, Liu Y, Gargac JA, Niebur GL, Wagner DR, Roeder RK (2015) Hydroxyapatite reinforced collagen scaffolds with improved architecture and mechanical properties. Acta Biomater 17:16–25

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Todo M, Park SD, Arakawa K, Takenoshita Y (2006) Relationship between microstructure and fracture behavior of bioabsorbable HA/PLLA composites. Compos Pat A Appl Sci 37:2221–2225

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. ASTM Standard E399-17, Standard test method for linear-elastic plane-strain fracture toughness KIC of metallic materials, ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, 2017

  18. ASTM Standard D5045-14, Standard test methods for plane-strain fracture toughness and strain energy release rate of plastic materials, ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, 2014

  19. Marghitu D, Diaconescu C, Ciocirlan B (2001) 3—Mechanics of materials. In: Irwin J (ed) Mechanical engineer’s handbook. Academic Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  20. Mechanical Finder v7.0, Research Centre of Computational Mechanics Inc., 2019

  21. Sakka S, Bouaziz J, Ben Ayed F (2013) Mechanical properties of biomaterials based on calcium phosphates and bioinert oxides for applications in biomedicine. In: Pignatello R (ed) Advances in biomaterials science and biomedical applications. IntechOpen, Rijeka

    Google Scholar 

  22. Laasri S, Taha M, Hlil E, Laghzizil A, Hajjaji A (2012) Manufacturing and mechanical properties of calcium phosphate biomaterials. C R Mech 340:715–720

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Farah S, Anderson DG, Langer R (2016) Physical and mechanical properties of PLA and their functions in widespread applications—a comprehensive review. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 107:367–392

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Metsger DS, Rieger MR, Foreman DW (1999) Mechanical properties of sintered hydroxyapatite and tricalcium phosphate ceramic. J Mater Sci Mater Med 10:9–17

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Eawwiboonthanakit N, Jaafar M, Abdul HZ, Todo M, Lila B (2014) Tensile properties of poly(l-lactic) acid (PLLA) blends. Adv Mater Res 1024:179–183

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Molecular and Material Sciences, Kyushu University, Kasuga, Japan

    John Duckworth

  2. Kyushu Institute of Information Sciences, Dazaifu, Japan

    Takaaki Arahira

  3. Research Institute for Applied Mechanics, Kyushu University, Kasuga, Japan

    Mitsugu Todo

Authors
  1. John Duckworth
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Takaaki Arahira
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Mitsugu Todo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mitsugu Todo.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Duckworth, J., Arahira, T. & Todo, M. Fracture characterization of novel bioceramic microbeads filled polymer composite. J Mater Sci 55, 8954–8967 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-020-04656-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-020-04656-w

Search

Navigation