Abstract
Introduction
Medial closed-wedge distal femoral osteotomy (MCWDFO) is a valuable treatment approach for lateral knee osteoarthritis with femoral valgus deformity. Improved results have been reported with the upgrade of surgical techniques and locking plates. However, the risk of nonunion and loss of correction increases in cases of lateral hinge fractures. This study aimed to evaluate the mechanical impact of hinge fractures and support instruments in MCWDFO using finite element analysis (FEA).
Materials and methods
Five femur models were developed using Mechanical Finder 11.0 FEA software. We simulated the following models: only a medial locking plate (MLP) (group A); an MLP with a lateral support screw (group B); and an MLP with a lateral support plate (group C). The equivalent stress around the hinge was evaluated and the percentage of the plastic deformation zone was calculated for the hinge area in the no-hinge fracture model. The equivalent stress of the MLP and the degree of displacement were calculated using the hinge fracture model.
Results
The percentages of the plastic deformation zone in groups A, B, and C were 18.0 ± 11.7%, 3.3 ± 2.4%, and 2.3 ± 2.8%, respectively. The percentages tended to be lower in groups B and C than in group A. In the hinge fracture model, the mean equivalent stress of the MLP in group C was significantly less than that in group A. In terms of the mean degree of displacement, group A showed more than 1 mm of displacement, which was significantly larger than that of the other groups.
Conclusion
The support instruments provided stability to the hinge site and reduced the equivalent stress of the main plate in the MCWDFO with hinge fractures. No significant difference was observed between the two instruments in terms of stability.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data, materials, and/or code availability
The datasets used and/or analyzed during the present study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.
References
Shivji FS, Foster A, Risebury MJ, Wilson AJ, Yasen SK (2021) Ten-year survival rate of 89% after distal femoral osteotomy surgery for lateral compartment osteoarthritis of the knee. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 29:594–599. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-020-05988-5
van Heerwaarden R, Brinkman JM, Pronk Y (2017) Correction of femoral valgus deformity. J Knee Surg 30:746–755. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0037-1602138
Forkel P, Achtnich A, Metzlaff S, Zantop T, Petersen W (2015) Midterm results following medial closed wedge distal femoral osteotomy stabilized with a locking internal fixation device. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 23:2061–2067. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-014-2953-1
Hoorntje A, van Ginneken BT, Kuijer PPFM, Koenraadt KLM, van Geenen RCI, Kerkhoffs GMMJ, van Heerwaarden RJ (2019) Eight respectively nine out of ten patients return to sport and work after distal femoral osteotomy. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 27:2345–2353. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-018-5206-x
Nha KW, Kim KW, Bae JH, Jang KM, Kim SG (2021) Detection of lateral hinge fractures after medial closing wedge distal femoral osteotomy: computed tomography versus plain radiography. Am J Sports Med 49:3350–3356. https://doi.org/10.1177/03635465211031434
Rupp MC, Winkler PW, Lutz PM, Irger M, Forkel P, Imhoff AB, Feucht MJ (2022) Dislocated hinge fractures are associated with malunion after lateral closing wedge distal femoral osteotomy. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 30:982–992. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-021-06466-2
Lobenhoffer P, van Heerwaarden R, StaubliAE JRP (2011) Osteotomies around the knee. Thieme, Stuttgart
Keyak JH, Lee IY, Skinner HB (1994) Correlations between orthogonal mechanical properties and density of trabecular bone: use of different densitometric measures. J Biomed Mater Res 28:1329–1336. https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.820281111
Ike H, Inaba Y, Kobayashi N, Hirata Y, Yukizawa Y, Aoki C, Choe H, Saito T (2015) Comparison between mechanical stress and bone mineral density in the femur after total hip arthroplasty by using subject-specific finite element analyses. Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin 18:1056–1065. https://doi.org/10.1080/10255842.2013.869320
Claes LE (1998) Effects of mechanical factors on the fracture healing process. Clin Orthop Relat Res. https://doi.org/10.1097/00003086-199810001-00015
Jagodzinski M, Krettek C (2007) Effect of mechanical stability on fracture healing—an update. Injury 38:S3-10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2007.02.005
Matsushita T, Akiyama T, Osano K, Yokoyama Y, Okazaki K (2022) Biomechanical analysis of the role of hinge support fixators on hinge stability in medial closing wedge distal femoral osteotomy. Clin Biomech 91:105528. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2021.105528
Nha KW, Kim HS, Jin DU, Bae JH, Patel JM, Kim SG (2022) Predictive factors for lateral hinge fracture in medial closing wedge distal femoral osteotomy. Am J Sports Med 50:3819–3826. https://doi.org/10.1177/03635465221131527
Meisterhans M, Flury A, Zindel C, Zimmermann SM, Vlachopoulos L, Snedeker JG, Fucentese SF (2023) Finite element analysis of medial closing and lateral opening wedge osteotomies of the distal femur in relation to hinge fractures. J Exp Orthop 10:33. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40634-023-00597-w
Liska F, Voss A, Imhoff FB, Willinger L, Imhoff AB (2018) Nonunion and delayed union in lateral open wedge distal femoral osteotomies-a legitimate concern? Int Orthop 42:9–15. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-017-3504-4
Itou J, Kuwashima U, Itoh M, Kuroda K, Yokoyama Y, Okazaki K (2021) Monocortical fixation for locking plate distal screws does not impair mechanical properties in open-wedge high tibial osteotomy. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 22:157. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-021-03999-y
Acknowledgements
We would like to thank Editage (www.editage.com) for the English language editing.
Funding
This work was jointly funded by the Tokyo Women’s Medical University and Olympus Terumo Biomaterials Corp.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
UK: Conception and design of the study, drafting of the article, data acquisition, analysis, and interpretation. MI: Drafting of the article and critical revision of its contents. JI: Drafting of the article and critical revision of its content. KO: Drafting of the article and critical revision of its contents, as well as approval of the final version to be submitted.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare no potential conflicts of interest regarding the research, authorship, or publication of this article.
Compliance with ethical standards
All procedures involving human participants were conducted in accordance with the ethical standards of the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki and its later amendments. This study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of Tokyo Women’s Medical University (No. 4713-R).
Consent to participate
Informed consent was obtained for the present study using an opt-out procedure.
Consent to publish
Informed consent for data and photographs publishing was obtained from the participants using an opt-out procedure.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Kuwashima, U., Itoh, M., Itou, J. et al. Impact of support instruments in medial closed-wedge distal femoral osteotomy: a finite element analysis. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 144, 1039–1045 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-023-05152-x
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-023-05152-x