Comparison study of bone strength of the proximal femur with and without hip osteoarthritis by computed tomography-based finite element analysis
Sugano M, Hagiwara S, Nakamura J, et al. Journal of Biomechanics. Volume 105, 22 May 2020, 109810
Effect of sagittal pelvic tilt on joint stress distribution in hip dysplasia: A finite element analysis
Kitamura K, Fujii M, Utsunomiya T, et al. Clinical Biomechanics. Volume 74, April 2020, Pages 34-41
Distribution of Femoral Head Subchondral Fracture Site Relates to Contact Pressures, Age, and Acetabular Structure
Kubo Y, Motomura G, Utsunomiya T, et al. American Journal of Roentgenology. Volume 215, Issue 2
Prediction of the pathological fracture risk during stance and fall-loading configurations for metastases in the proximal femur, using a computed tomography-based finite element method
Shinoda Y, et al. Journal of Orthopaedic Science. Available online 11 September 2019
Potential bone fragility of mid-shaft atypical femoral fracture: Biomechanical analysis by a CT-based nonlinear finite element method
Tano A, et al. Injury. Available online 3 September 2019
Analysis of Principal Stress Projection in Femur with Total Hip Arthroplasty using CT-image Based Finite Element Method
Fukuoka K, et al. International Archives of Orthopedic Surgery. 2018 Volume 1:003
Effects of sclerotic changes on stress concentration in early‐stage osteonecrosis: A patient‐specific, 3D finite element analysis
Utsunomiya T, et al. J Orthop Res. 2018 Aug 11.
Finite element analysis of the femoral diaphysis of fresh-frozen cadavers with computed tomography and mechanical testing
Wako Y, et al. Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research (2018) 13:192
Mechanical Strength of the Proximal Femur After Arthroscopic Osteochondroplasty for Femoroacetabular Impingement: Finite Element Analysis and 3-Dimensional Image Analysis
Oba M, et al. Arthroscopy. Volume 34, Issue 8, Pages 2377–2386.
Biomechanical Analysis of Hip Joint Arthroplasties using CT-Image Based Finite Element Method
Todo M. Journal of Surgery and Research 1 (2018): 34-41.
